Cobber vs Betonic
Who pays out faster, who has more games, and what the two casinos have in common.
Cobber
BetonicWhat they have in common
We compare 14 things. For each one: what both casinos have, divided by everything either of them has. The total is the average, where the things that matter more count more. Press ⓘ on a row to see exactly what is shared.
- PaymentsAbout half the same58% in commonweight 13
- Game providersSome in common26% in commonweight 10
- Only at Cobber11
- Both22
- Only at Betonic52
- Hacksaw Gaming
- Playson
- Evolution Gaming
- Thunderkick
- Big Time Gaming (BTG)
- Booming Games
- Endorphina
- Spribe
- Relax Gaming
- Blueprint Gaming
- Ruby Play
- Smartsoft
- Avatar UX
- Gamzix
- Novomatic
- Booongo (BNG)
- Iron Dog Studio
- Ezugi
- Elk Studios
- Wazdan
- g.games
- Gamomat
- Gaming Corps
- Red Rake Gaming
- Skywind Group
- inout
- Felix Gaming
- Turbo Games
- Push Gaming
- OneTouch Games
- BF Games
- Amigo Gaming
- Oryx Gaming
- LuckyStreak
- Vivo Gaming
- Just For The Win (JFTW)
- Foxium
- Stakelogic
- Kiron Interactive
- Triple Edge Studios
- Stormcraft Studios
- Eyecon
- Givme Games
- Eurasian Gaming
- iSoftBet
- Atomic Slot Lab
- Northernlights
- Arcadem
- Indigo Magic
- InBet
- Bluberi studio
- Toucan Royale
- LanguagesSome in common25% in commonweight 9
- Only at Cobber0
- None
- Both1
- LicencesThe same100% in commonweight 9
- Only at Cobber0
- None
- Both1
- Only at Betonic0
- None
- CurrenciesSome in common25% in commonweight 7
- Game typesSome in common38% in commonweight 7
- Only at Cobber0
- None
- Both3
- Slots
- Blackjack
- Bingo
- Only at Betonic5
- Roulette
- Video Poker
- Baccarat
- Keno
- Scratch Cards
- DevicesThe same100% in commonweight 5
- Only at Cobber0
- None
- Both2
- Mobile
- Desktop
- Only at Betonic0
- None
- Responsible gamingThe same100% in commonweight 4
- Only at Cobber0
- None
- Both3
- Deposit Limits
- Loss Limits
- Self Exclusion
- Only at Betonic0
- None
- CryptoAbout half the same40% in commonweight 4
- Payout speedThe same100% in commonweight 3
Cobber: Within 24 hoursBetonic: Within 24 hours
The same speed counts 100%, the next one up or down 50%, anything further apart 0%.
- SupportThe same100% in commonweight 3
- Only at Cobber0
- None
- Both2
- Live Chat
- Only at Betonic0
- None
Not counted, because one of them doesn’t list it
- MarketsNot listed for eitherweight 8
- Popular gamesNot listed for eitherweight 4
- CertificatesNot listed for eitherweight 4
In common, weighted57%
Only at CobberBothOnly at Betonic
How matching worksWho is better at what
Based on the facts both casinos list. Payouts come first because slow withdrawals are what players complain about most.
Where Cobber is ahead
- Lower minimum deposit5 EUR vs 10 EUR
- More ways to withdraw24 methods vs 12 methods
Where Betonic is ahead
- Lower minimum withdrawal10 EUR vs 20 EUR
- Lower bonus wagering25× vs 60×
- More game providers74 vs 33
The same: Payouts: Within 24 hours; Support around the clock: No.
Can’t compare yet, because one of them doesn’t list it: daily withdrawal limit, monthly withdrawal limit, games and live tables.
Side by side
Everything both casinos list, group by group. Where one of them is better, its value is in green.
| Payments | Cobber | Betonic |
|---|---|---|
| Payouts | Within 24 hours | Within 24 hours |
| Minimum deposit | 5 EUR | 10 EUR |
| Minimum withdrawal | 20 EUR | 10 EUR |
| Daily withdrawal limit | 3,000 EUR | Not listed |
| Monthly withdrawal limit | 30,000 EUR | Not listed |
| Ways to withdraw | 24 | 12 |
| Bonus | Cobber | Betonic |
|---|---|---|
| Welcome bonus | 100% bonus + 100 free spins60× wagering | 100% bonus + 20 free spins25× wagering |
| Games | Cobber | Betonic |
|---|---|---|
| Games | Not listed | Not listed |
| Live tables | Not listed | Not listed |
| Game providers | 33 | 74 |
| Licence and company | Cobber | Betonic |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | ||
| Platform | Not listed | Not listed |
| Owner | Dama N.V. | Bellona N.V. |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
| Support and countries | Cobber | Betonic |
|---|---|---|
| Support |
|
|
| Not available in |
|
|
| Player rating | 4.0 out of 51 review | 3.0 out of 51 review |