DublinBet vs FatBoss
Who pays out faster, who has more games, and what the two casinos have in common.
DublinBet
FatBossWhat they have in common
We compare 14 things. For each one: what both casinos have, divided by everything either of them has. The total is the average, where the things that matter more count more. Press ⓘ on a row to see exactly what is shared.
- PaymentsMostly the same78% in commonweight 13
- Only at DublinBet1
- Only at FatBoss1
- Game providersMostly the same66% in commonweight 10
- Only at DublinBet14
- Both42
- Pragmatic Play
- NetEnt
- Hacksaw Gaming
- Red Tiger
- Playson
- Play'n GO
- Betsoft
- Evolution Gaming
- NoLimit City
- Spinomenal
- BGaming
- Yggdrasil Gaming
- Thunderkick
- Big Time Gaming (BTG)
- Games Global
- Booming Games
- Quickspin
- EvoPlay
- Relax Gaming
- Habanero
- Mascot Gaming
- Avatar UX
- Gamzix
- Platipus
- Novomatic
- Booongo (BNG)
- Wazdan
- Amusnet
- Swintt
- Mancala Gaming
- CT Gaming (Casino Technology)
- Push Gaming
- Fantasma
- ReelPlay
- Amigo Gaming
- TaDa Gaming
- Stakelogic
- iSoftBet
- Genii Gaming
- Altente Gaming
- Air Dice
- WorldMatch
- LanguagesAbout half the same50% in commonweight 9
- Only at FatBoss0
- None
- LicencesThe same100% in commonweight 9
- Only at DublinBet0
- None
- Both1
- Only at FatBoss0
- None
- CurrenciesPartly the same67% in commonweight 7
- Only at DublinBet0
- None
- Only at FatBoss1
- Game typesThe same100% in commonweight 7
- Only at DublinBet0
- None
- Both8
- Slots
- Blackjack
- Roulette
- Bingo
- Video Poker
- Baccarat
- Keno
- Scratch Cards
- Only at FatBoss0
- None
- DevicesThe same100% in commonweight 5
- Only at DublinBet0
- None
- Both2
- Mobile
- Desktop
- Only at FatBoss0
- None
- Responsible gamingThe same100% in commonweight 4
- Only at DublinBet0
- None
- Both2
- Deposit Limits
- Self Exclusion
- Only at FatBoss0
- None
- CryptoThe same100% in commonweight 4
- Only at DublinBet0
- None
- Only at FatBoss0
- None
- Payout speedThe same100% in commonweight 3
DublinBet: InstantFatBoss: Instant
The same speed counts 100%, the next one up or down 50%, anything further apart 0%.
- SupportThe same100% in commonweight 3
- Only at DublinBet0
- None
- Both2
- Live Chat
- Only at FatBoss0
- None
Not counted, because one of them doesn’t list it
- MarketsNot listed for eitherweight 8
- Popular gamesNot listed for eitherweight 4
- CertificatesNot listed for eitherweight 4
In common, weighted82%
Only at DublinBetBothOnly at FatBoss
How matching worksWho is better at what
Based on the facts both casinos list. Payouts come first because slow withdrawals are what players complain about most.
Where DublinBet is ahead
- Lower minimum withdrawal20 EUR vs 30 EUR
- More ways to withdraw6 methods vs 3 methods
- Lower bonus wagering30× vs 45×
- More game providers56 vs 50
Where FatBoss is ahead
- Lower minimum deposit15 EUR vs 20 EUR
The same: Payouts: Instant; Monthly withdrawal limit: 16,000 EUR; Support around the clock: No.
Can’t compare yet, because one of them doesn’t list it: daily withdrawal limit, games and live tables.
Side by side
Everything both casinos list, group by group. Where one of them is better, its value is in green.
| Payments | DublinBet | FatBoss |
|---|---|---|
| Payouts | Instant | Instant |
| Minimum deposit | 20 EUR | 15 EUR |
| Minimum withdrawal | 20 EUR | 30 EUR |
| Daily withdrawal limit | Not listed | Not listed |
| Monthly withdrawal limit | 16,000 EUR | 16,000 EUR |
| Ways to withdraw | 6 | 3 |
| Bonus | DublinBet | FatBoss |
|---|---|---|
| Welcome bonus | 100% bonus + 50 free spins30× wagering | 100% bonus + 100 free spins45× wagering |
| Games | DublinBet | FatBoss |
|---|---|---|
| Games | Not listed | Not listed |
| Live tables | Not listed | Not listed |
| Game providers | 56 | 50 |
| Licence and company | DublinBet | FatBoss |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | ||
| Platform | Not listed | Not listed |
| Owner | Mobile Technology Marketing B.V. | Mobile Technology Marketing B.V. |
| Founded | 2009 | 2019 |
| Support and countries | DublinBet | FatBoss |
|---|---|---|
| Support |
|
|
| Not available in |
|
|
| Player rating | 5.0 out of 51 review | Not listed |
