GetSlots vs Dazard
Who pays out faster, who has more games, and what the two casinos have in common.
GetSlots63%in commonSimilarBased on 11 of the 14 things we compare
DazardWhat they have in common
We compare 14 things. For each one: what both casinos have, divided by everything either of them has. The total is the average, where the things that matter more count more. Press ⓘ on a row to see exactly what is shared.
- PaymentsSome in common28% in commonweight 13
- Only at GetSlots1
- Game providersMostly the same67% in commonweight 10
- Only at GetSlots9
- Both50
- Pragmatic Play
- NetEnt
- Hacksaw Gaming
- Red Tiger
- Playson
- Play'n GO
- Betsoft
- Evolution Gaming
- NoLimit City
- Spinomenal
- BGaming
- Yggdrasil Gaming
- Thunderkick
- Games Global
- Booming Games
- Endorphina
- Quickspin
- EvoPlay
- Spribe
- Relax Gaming
- Playtech
- Blueprint Gaming
- Habanero
- Avatar UX
- Platipus
- Booongo (BNG)
- GameArt
- Ezugi
- Elk Studios
- Amusnet
- Gamomat
- Belatra
- CT Gaming (Casino Technology)
- Push Gaming
- Apparat
- ReelPlay
- Reevo
- NetGame Entertainment
- Zillion
- 1spin4win
- 4the Player
- Mr. Slotty
- Nucleus Gaming
- Print Studios
- TrueLab
- Bullshark Games
- Clawbuster
- Boomerang Studios
- Four Leaf Gaming
- Electric Elephant
- LanguagesSome in common33% in commonweight 9
- Only at GetSlots0
- None
- LicencesThe same100% in commonweight 9
- Only at GetSlots0
- None
- Only at Dazard0
- None
- CurrenciesMostly the same60% in commonweight 7
- Game typesThe same100% in commonweight 7
- Only at GetSlots0
- None
- Both8
- Slots
- Blackjack
- Roulette
- Bingo
- Video Poker
- Baccarat
- Keno
- Scratch Cards
- Only at Dazard0
- None
- DevicesPartly the same50% in commonweight 5
- Only at GetSlots0
- None
- Both1
- Mobile
- Only at Dazard1
- Desktop
- Responsible gamingThe same100% in commonweight 4
- Only at GetSlots0
- None
- Both3
- Deposit Limits
- Loss Limits
- Self Exclusion
- Only at Dazard0
- None
- CryptoAbout half the same44% in commonweight 4
- Only at GetSlots0
- None
- Payout speedThe same100% in commonweight 3
GetSlots: InstantDazard: Instant
The same speed counts 100%, the next one up or down 50%, anything further apart 0%.
- SupportPartly the same67% in commonweight 3
- Only at GetSlots1
- Phone
- Both2
- Live Chat
- Only at Dazard0
- None
Not counted, because one of them doesn’t list it
- MarketsNot listed for eitherweight 8
- Popular gamesNot listed for eitherweight 4
- CertificatesNot listed for eitherweight 4
In common, weighted63%
Only at GetSlotsBothOnly at Dazard
How matching worksWho is better at what
Based on the facts both casinos list. Payouts come first because slow withdrawals are what players complain about most.
Where GetSlots is ahead
Nowhere, on the facts we have.
Where Dazard is ahead
- More ways to withdraw13 methods vs 6 methods
- More game providers66 vs 59
The same: Payouts: Instant; Minimum deposit: 20 EUR; Minimum withdrawal: 20 EUR; Bonus wagering: 40×; Support around the clock: No.
Can’t compare yet, because one of them doesn’t list it: daily withdrawal limit, monthly withdrawal limit, games and live tables.
Side by side
Everything both casinos list, group by group. Where one of them is better, its value is in green.
| Payments | GetSlots | Dazard |
|---|---|---|
| Payouts | Instant | Instant |
| Minimum deposit | 20 EUR | 20 EUR |
| Minimum withdrawal | 20 EUR | 20 EUR |
| Daily withdrawal limit | Not listed | 2,000 EUR |
| Monthly withdrawal limit | Not listed | 20,000 EUR |
| Ways to withdraw | 6 | 13 |
| Bonus | GetSlots | Dazard |
|---|---|---|
| Welcome bonus | 100% bonus + 100 free spins40× wagering | 150% bonus + 150 free spins40× wagering |
| Games | GetSlots | Dazard |
|---|---|---|
| Games | Not listed | Not listed |
| Live tables | Not listed | Not listed |
| Game providers | 59 | 66 |
| Licence and company | GetSlots | Dazard |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | ||
| Platform | Not listed | Not listed |
| Owner | Dama N.V. | Dama N.V. |
| Founded | Not listed | 2021 |
| Support and countries | GetSlots | Dazard |
|---|---|---|
| Support |
|
|
| Not available in |
|
|
| Player rating | 4.0 out of 51 review | 2.0 out of 51 review |
